• Post author:
• Post category:Blog

## Refer to a portion of an EIGRP topology table:

```P 172.18.3.0/24, 1 successors, __ is 2172416
via 172.18.4.3 (2172416/28160), Serial0/0/1
P 172.18.5.0/24, 1 successors, __ is 2495120
via 172.18.6.3 (2495120/227692), Serial0/1/0
P 192.168.24.0/24, 1 successors, __ is 2684416
via 192.168.13.5 (2684416/2072316), Serial0/0/0
via 172.18.4.3 (2854912/2342912), Serial0/0/1
P 10.34.1.0/24, 1 successors, __ is 3072
via 10.13.1.3 (3072/2937), GigabitEthernet0/1
via 10.14.1.4 (5376/2937), GigabitEthernet0/2```

## What is the metric for the feasible successor route for 10.34.1.0/24?

• 5376
• 2937
• 3072
• 2495120
 Explanation & Hints: The metric for the feasible successor route for the network 10.34.1.0/24 is 5376. In the EIGRP topology table provided, there are two routes to the network 10.34.1.0/24: The successor route via 10.13.1.3 with a metric (feasible distance) of 3072 and a reported distance (RD) of 2937. The feasible successor route via 10.14.1.4 with a metric of 5376 and the same RD of 2937. The feasible successor is an alternate path that satisfies EIGRP’s feasibility condition, meaning its RD is less than the feasible distance of the successor route. In this context, the metric (or feasible distance) for the feasible successor route to 10.34.1.0/24 via 10.14.1.4 is 5376.

Subscribe
Notify of